Chad Jacobi is a barrister practising principally in public, employment, criminal law (particularly regulatory crime) and general civil matters.  He has particular interest and experience in appellate work and in inquiries.

He practises in Adelaide as a member of Edmund Barton Chambers and in Darwin, as a Visiting Counsel of William Forster Chambers.

He was in 2016-17, junior counsel for the Northern Territory Government in the Royal Commission into Protection and Detention of Children in the Northern Territory.  In 2015-16, he was Counsel Assisting the South Australian Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission.  He was in 2005, Solicitor Assisting the Kapunda Road Royal Commission.

Prior to joining the independent bar, he was employed in the South Australian Crown Solicitor’s Office. In its Crown Counsel Section from 2010-2015 he undertook counsel work primarily in constitutional, administrative law and criminal cases in the Full Court of the Supreme Court[1] and before single Justices, and as a junior counsel to the Solicitor-General for South Australia in the High Court.[2]

He was admitted to practice in 2001, and at the conclusion of his role as Associate to Chief Justice Doyle was employed initially as the Research Assistant to the Solicitor-General, and then as a solicitor within its Advising and Administrative and Environment Sections. 

He is committed to and interested in legal education. He was as an organiser of Continuing Professional Development programs in the Crown Solicitor's Office and has tutored at Adelaide University, principally in civil procedure.

He is the co-editor and author of the legal publication Summary Justice - South Australia (concerned with summary criminal procedure in South Australia).  His forthcoming book on the Interpretation Acts will be published by Thomson Reuters in 2018.

[1] Dietmann v Brennan-Kuss (2015) 123 SASR 24; R v Draoui (2015) 122 SASR 360; Channel 9 SA PL v Police (No.2) (2014) 121 SASR 87; Police v Majchrak (2014) 120 SASR 192; Police v Bleeze (2012) 112 SASR 568; Police v Short (2012) 112 SASR 463; Police v Berzins (2011) 111 SASR 319; Moore v AI Automotive Ltd [2011] SASCFC 203

[2] Kuczborski v Queensland (2014) 254 CLR 51; Williams v The Commonwealth (No.2) (2014) 252 CLR 416; Magaming v The Queen (2013) 252 CLR 381; DPP v Keating [2013]; X7 v Australian Crime Commission and Anor [2012]; Plaintiff S10/2011 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2012) 246 CLR 636; Momcilovic v The Queen (2011) 245 CLR 1; Saeed v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2010) 241 CLR 252; Hutchison 3G v City of Mitcham (2006) 80 ALR 711; BHP Billiton v Schultz (2004) 221 CLR 400; Mulholland v AEC (2004) 220 CLR 181; Coleman v Power (2004) 220 CLR 1; Cattanach v Melchior (2003) 215 CLR 1; New South Wales v Lepore (2003) 212 CLR 511; Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476

Recent cases to judgment
Andrzejczak v DECD [2017] SAET 183 (classification under transition provisions of the RTW Act)
Harrington v Healthscope [2017] SAET 65 (scope of s18 RTW Act)
R v Taheri [2017] SASCFC 115

Further Information


Link to SA Bar Profile